beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a driver of the Ding Convention ConventionS car owned by ASEAN.
1. The first accident: (a) around 18:20 on August 10, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.217% of blood alcohol concentration, and the front distance in the north-gu in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-si was driven along the two-lanes of the two-lane distance distance from the two-lanes. At the time, the signal, etc. in front of the Defendant’s proceeding direction was suspended, and thus, (b) the Defendant, who is engaged in driving, had a duty of care to look well at the front direction and left and right, and to accurately operate the steering and brakes.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) neglected to stop the signal atmosphere at the front direction of the Defendant’s running route while driving the HG (72 years of age, south) which was driven by the victim G (hereinafter referred to as “V”); (b) led the Defendant to the part of the driver’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle to the part of the driver’s vehicle; and (c) suffered an injury to the Defendant, such as salt, tension, etc. of a tension, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment; and (d) failed to take necessary measures, such as providing relief, by immediately stopping the car to the extent that the repair cost is approximately KRW 605,00,000 of the repair cost.
2. On August 10, 2014, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and escaped, at around 19:00, the second accident: (a) around August 10, 2014, the roads in front of the J-owned Station I located in Gwangju Northern-gu I used the right line to the right line of the library, from the right line to the right line of the library. Since the two double lines are installed, the Defendant who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely proceed by using the right line of the central line.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent and proceeded beyond the median line, is driving by the victim K (71 years of age and South) who was proceeding along the opposite lane.