The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (1,500,000 won) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case in the trial at the time of the judgment, and that the defendant was not healthy as a recipient of basic living, and that the awareness of illegality was weak at the time of the crime of this case.

On the other hand, in light of the purport of the National Basic Living Security Act for the purpose of guaranteeing the minimum standard of living for those who have difficulties in living and helping them support self-support, there is a need to punish the defendant who received the benefits by unlawful means in light of the purport of the National Basic Living Security Act, the amount of illegal benefits that the defendant received is a large amount, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment several times, the court below appears to have sentenced to a fine reduced than the fine amount of the summary order in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and other factors revealed in the course of the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, background and motive leading to the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, the court below's sentencing was too too excessive and exceeded

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.