The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant’s judgment is against all the criminal acts of fraud that were denied by the lower court in the first instance trial is recognized, and there is no record of the same kind of crime, and that it is necessary to consider the equity between the case where the Defendant received the judgment and the case where the Defendant received the judgment at the same time due to the concurrent crimes of gambling and the subsequent Article 37 of the Criminal Act

However, considering the fact that there is no change of circumstances after the judgment of the court below, such as the fact that the amount of fraud or the amount of embezzlement is large, and that there is no agreement with the victims, and other various conditions of sentencing recorded in the records, such as the method of crime, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.