logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고정1084
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. Defendant B, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.060% in blood, Defendant B was under the influence of alcohol content 0.095% in blood, Defendant B operated the back of FJE PPPPPPPPPPPPPP25 Oral, Defendant A, on October 11, 2015, on the front edge of the above Oralba, and around 06:20 on October 11, 2015, Defendant B operated the above Oralba in a way that he operated the steering system and operation system of the above Oralba in a way that he operated the above Oralba in a way that he operated the steering system and speed of the above Oralba, from around 100 meters in a part of approximately 400 meters in a way that he operated the above Oralba in a way that he operated the above Oralba in a way that he operated the above Oralba in a way that he operated the steering system and speed of the above Oralaba.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly driven a drinking alcohol.

B. Defendants in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents were on the date and time set forth in the preceding paragraph, at the place under the influence of alcohol, Defendant A was on the front page, and Defendant B jointly driving the above Orala in the way set forth in the following preceding paragraphs, with the operation of the above Orala on the back page, and the passage of the apartment complex 113, the lower part of the apartment complex 112 and the lower part of Seoul Guro-gu Digital Complex 90,000,000,000 square meters from 112 to 116.

In such cases, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering system, brakes, and other devices of vehicles for those engaged in off-to-land driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendants passed the speed limit set up in the front bank by negligence while neglecting the duty of care under the influence of alcohol, and had they go beyond the center and go beyond the center.

After all, Defendant B caused the victim A to suffer from approximately six weeks of treatment due to the above joint occupational negligence, and Defendant A was negligent in the above joint occupational negligence.

arrow