logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.04.04 2018고정167
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while working as a cook at “C Oriental Medical Hospital” and using another cook, etc., was able to obtain the keys of clothes clothes, posters, and crepits without any change in the escape room through an insular route, and was in mind to commit the act of using the method of using the clothes in the above keys and the cash, etc. in the bags kept therein.

1. On July 26, 2017, around 14:50, women E (n, 43 years old) under the ground of C oriental medical hospitals located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., left the clothes of vegetable victims E (n, n, 43 years old) of the above hospital, and then used the cret in the vegetable room in order to lock and work in the vegetable room, using the vegetable keys, sticking the vege of the vegetable key to the vegetable room, and cut off 5,00 won in cash from the kitchen in his/her custody.

2. On July 26, 2017, around 14:55, at the time and place of the preceding paragraph, opening the clothes clothes used by the private cooking F (M, 43 years old) of the above hospital under the method set forth in the preceding paragraph, and subsequently conducting an attempted attempt without money or other valuables to steal the proposal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of F of the police statement protocol to the defendant's legal statement E;

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts and Articles 329 (Section 329), 342, and 329 (Article 329 (Article 329) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment (Article 342, and Article 329) of the Criminal Act on the charge of larceny is omitted, but a simple clerical error appears to be a clerical error, and even if ex officio application is added, there is no substantial disadvantage to the defense of the defendant, and ex officio application of the law without the amendment of indictment was added without the amendment of indictment)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (the aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment heavier than that prescribed for larceny);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which appears to be a small amount or planned crime, circumstances after the crime, and the victim.

arrow