1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Party-related 1) E is a corporation D (hereinafter “D”) from around 2002 to the date of the closing of the instant argument.

Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is working as the representative director from around 2005 to the date of closing the argument in this case.

(2) E and Defendant B are pro-friendly relationships.

B. At the time of February 29, 2012, the Plaintiff had a claim for the construction equipment cost of KRW 135,346,770 against D as of February 29, 2012.

C. D’s legal act: (a) each of the Defendants prepared and executed a notarial deed on March 6, 2012 each of the “written rejection of the payment of rent”; and (b) March 7, 2012 each of the notarial deeds on each of the monetary loan agreements as indicated in the separate sheet, which included the intent of accepting compulsory execution under the said sheet.

The contents of each of the above lendings and the notarial deeds of a monetary loan contract are as listed in the following table:

(1) Each of the following table shall be named as "one sheet", "one document", "two separate deeds", "three separate deeds", "three separate deeds", and "three separate deeds" or "three separate deeds" as shown below. When each of the three separate deeds and three separate deeds is referred to as "each of the separate deeds in this case" or "each of the separate deeds in this case" / [Attachment 1] and the other party (Defendant) as stated in the letter of loan performance and five separate deeds as stated in the letter of five separate deeds as of December 29, 201, No. 110,00, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 31, 20, 20, 20, 3, 20, 20, 20, 3, 20, 20, 20, 20, 3, 20, 201, 3, 20, 20, 29, 2, 20.

(d) the new bank of D D’s default;