logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.06.29 2015고정216
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the above defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] Around August 16, 2012, the LIM entered into a contract with the victim D to lease the parking lot of the building (hereinafter “instant parking lot”) by August 15, 2014.

On March 21, 2014, the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. purchased the building from the Dispute Resolution Industry, and succeeded to the status of the lessor under the above Lease Contract as it is. However, on June 2014, the victim increased the parking fees without consultation, etc., it sent a mail to the victim to terminate the above Lease Contract on the ground that the victim raised the parking fees without permission.

On the other hand, on July 1, 2014, before the expiration of the term of the above lease agreement, the KFE entered into a lease agreement with the KFE with the meritorious Association of Special Duties of the Republic of Korea.

At the time, Defendant A was the representative director of the Dispute Resolution E, and Defendant B was the chief administrator of the building.

[Criminal Execution Office] Around 10:00 on July 1, 2014, FGH and a person who was unable to receive the instant parking lot from the victim, but the victim was refused to do so, and the failure to do so began while taking a bath for the victim.

The Defendants instructed the FF, etc. to prevent the entrance of the instant parking lot for about five hours from around that time in order to take possession of the instant parking lot, and accordingly, the said G, etc. prevented the entry of the instant parking lot at the entrance of the instant parking lot.

As a result, the Defendants interfered with the instant parking lot business of the victim by force in collusion with the FGH and the person in unsound name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the statements made by the Defendants in this Act

1. Each statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of F, G, and H prepared by the police;

1. Statement of statement on D prepared by the police;

1.A investigation report prepared by the police (as to attachment ofCC-TV photographs with a surface of interference with violence and business), an investigation report (as to attachment of a copy of the parking lot lease agreement);

arrow