1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff was supplied with parts such as Hdgas diskettes necessary for the assembly of automobile engines from the Defendant. The Plaintiff unilaterally ceased the supply of parts on the grounds that the Plaintiff paid goods late, and furthermore, the Defendant could no longer use inventory goods, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 1,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

The defendant asserts that the defendant does not unilaterally suspend the supply of parts, but refuses the transaction of credit, and the cash transaction is possible at all times, so there is no liability for damages against the plaintiff.

The plaintiff's assertion is based on the premise that the defendant bears the duty to recover the plaintiff's inventory when the defendant continues to supply parts or ceases to supply parts. The evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant has the same duty as the defendant, and there is no other evidence to recognize this differently. Thus, the plaintiff's argument is without merit without a further review.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.