Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Details of the disposition
The Plaintiff is the owner of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 76 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”).
On September 192, 1992, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for permission to change the form and quality of the land before subdivision in order to construct a new building on the 347 square meters of land before D, Guro-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the land before subdivision”). Accordingly, on August 23, 1993, the Defendant permitted the Plaintiff’s change of the form and quality by adding the conditions for dividing the instant land from the land before subdivision to the road.
Accordingly, the land before subdivision was divided into the instant land and the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D-271 square meters.
Each of the above lands shall be in attached Form
1. The arrangement is made in the same way as the drawing;
Attached Form for the instant land
1. Of drawings, parts on the ship which connect each point in order of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 1 are parts on the ship.
In addition to the above conditions, the Plaintiff allowed the Plaintiff to use the instant land as a road. Of the instant land, the attached Form among the instant land.
1. Attached Form 4, 3, 6, 5, and 4 of drawings, a sudden slope in the part of brooms connected in sequence;
1. Of the drawings, the said part was made in the form of stairs since the part connecting 3 and 6 with the part connecting 4 and 5 was in the form of stairs. If the said stairs installed on the instant land were to be lowered, it would lead to the land of 279 square meters in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, and F purchased the said land around 2008, and G purchased the said land adjacent to the said land, Guro-gu Seoul, Seoul, H field 506 square meters in around 2008. F and G purchased the said land on the aggregate building (hereinafter “the instant new building”).
In the process of the new construction, the Seoul Central District Court 2010da26316 filed a lawsuit to confirm that the Plaintiff had the right to passage over the surrounding land (Seoul Central District Court 2010da26316), and the said court held on June 24, 201 that F and G have the right to passage over the surrounding land.