logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.09 2019나2045204
용역비
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the relevant part of the judgment of the first instance is used or added as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the 3rd side to the 3rd side, “The instant contract” was provided two (2) below the 3rd side of the amendment to the 3rd side of the “instant contract,” and “the Defendant obtained approval of a project implementation plan from the head of Songpa-gu on August 12, 2013, and approval of a management and disposal plan on April 27, 2015,” and “No. 5 (3)” was amended to “No. 5, 31, No. 7, and No. 8, No. 47, 207, 30, 14, 207, 207, 207, 207, 30, 207, 207, 47, 206, 207, 30, 207, 207, 215, 206, 207, 207, 215, 2014.

The plaintiff, at the bottom of the 7th to the 3rd, ratification of the contract of this case by adding the following contents, "the defendant conducted the procedures for the approval and establishment of the defendant promotion committee with the plaintiff's help, followed by the plaintiff's service provision, and followed the improvement project, such as approval of the project implementation plan, approval of the management and disposal plan, etc., followed by the plaintiff's service provision, and decided at the general meeting by organizing items of service cost to be paid to the plaintiff in the budget, and paid the service cost upon the plaintiff's request.

arrow