logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2013.06.13 2012가합111
공사대금 등
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 1,148,974,773 as well as KRW 50,00,000 among them, Defendant B Co., Ltd. from March 7, 2008, and 20.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B

A. Facts of recognition 1) Status Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)

The purpose is to approve a cooperative movement plan under the former Promotion of Small and Medium Enterprises and Encouragement of Purchase of Their Products Act, to manage and guide cooperative movement enterprises, to purchase and manage sites for cooperative movement projects, to develop sites for cooperative movement projects and sell sites, to approve joint factories, to support the construction of factories of participating enterprises, and to support loan-related affairs, etc., the "D Project Complex" (hereinafter referred to as the "project complex of this case").

In order to create and move into a corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as "participatings in this case"), such as Samwait, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "the Parties in this case").

(2) On September 17, 2008, the Plaintiff is a company established by the Defendant Company to create the site of the instant business complex (hereinafter “instant construction”).

(iii) 3,575,000,000 won (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) for the purchase;

(B) On August 29, 2009, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Defendant Company for retaining walls, water tanks, waterworks, fences, and septic tanks (hereinafter “instant additional works”) of the instant industrial complex in KRW 805,049,457. As agreed with the Defendant Company, the Plaintiff excluded pents work equivalent to KRW 105,60,000 from the price for the instant additional works.

C) On November 30, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company are the instant principal corporation and the instant additional corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant construction”).

A) The Plaintiff agreed to complete the instant construction by May 31, 2010. (3) The Plaintiff suspended the instant construction on or around June 2010, without having left the details of the non-construction as follows. The details of the construction cost (the instant construction cost 43,125,125,890 24,15,387 purification door, one non-construction 280,160,16 Man-Maper lid lid lids for the instant construction cost (the cost of the instant construction cost).

arrow