logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단3593
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of KRW 300,000.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On January 16, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won by the same court as the same crime. On December 30, 2009, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Criminal facts

1. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant was driving a BNCHOR 107cc-ckib in the section of 18 km from the village in front of the village in the middle village in the Young-gu, Young-gun, the Nam-gun, the Nam-gun, the Seoul, without a bicycle driver’s license, on June 5, 2017 to the road in front of the dry field in the middle village in the middle village in the middle village in the Yong-dong, the YOR 107cc-ckib.

2. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (dimplicing driving) on the part of the area where approximately 50 meters from the roads of dry field located in the vicinity of the station in Yan-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, Gwangju-gun, U.S., which is located in the vicinity of the station in Yandong, Yan-gun, Yan-gun, Yan-gun, YA-gun, the Defendant driven the above Yab on the road of about 0 meters from the roads of dry field in the vicinity

3. No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road;

Defendant 1 operated the foregoing Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above 1.1 and 2.2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Photographss related to traffic accidents;

1. The point of judgment: The application of a reply letter to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Subparagraph 2 of Article 154 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (non-licensed driving) concerning facts constituting an offense; Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking) of the same Act; Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Security Act.

arrow