Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From September 23, 2011 to December 25, 201, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant exceeded the inner string of the new string of the new strings, and as soon as possible, D, from around F, H, and J to the second floor of the E-2 floor where the Defendant and the victim D work for the Defendant and the victim D,” the Defendant stated that “I am off the inner string of the new strings with the new strings, the new strings, and the sexual organ of D, together with D’s singing.”

그러나 사실은 피해자가 피고인 남편 후배의 성기를 빤 일이 없었고, 피고인은 남편으로부터 D가 성기를 빨려고 하였다는 후배의 일방적인 말을 전해 들었을 뿐 그 사실의 진위 여부를 제대로 알지 못하였다.

The Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of witness F, G, and D in the third protocol of the trial of this Court 2012 High Court 2012 High Court 190

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. He/she shall make a report on investigation (including the preparation of a record of investigation of a witness) and make a report on investigation (including the preparation of a record of investigation);

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, a letter of complaint, a meeting to assist in agreement on case, a copy of the decision (Acheon-gu 2014No3709) and a copy of the decision (Sacheon-gu 2014No3

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not state the same end as the facts constituting the crime against the employees of the second floor of E.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the aforementioned evidence, i.e., ① between the Defendant and the victim and the husband of the Defendant and the Defendant’s husband and the victim, in 209 or in 2010.