All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence (one year of imprisonment) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Although the nature of the crime is not good due to the crime by deceiving loans through the abuse of the corporate purchase financing system, the amount of damage is not significant, and substantial damage is not deemed to have been recovered, the above assertion by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, in light of equity with the case where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with fraud, etc., and special changes in circumstances that could change the sentencing after the judgment of the court below cannot be discovered, and the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, as well as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is deemed appropriate, and it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.