A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2018, the Defendant, at around 22:30 on July 5, 2018, under the influence of alcohol in front of the Busan Southern-gu, Busan-gu, and on the ground that D staff members of the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd. are bad, the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report 112, such as making a police officer’s 112 report, by putting two strings of the E-Poter, owned by the victim, and destroying the repair cost. The Defendant, upon receiving a report 112 report, expressed his desire to get off the cargo vehicle from G at the border of the Busan Southern-gu Police Station of Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, the Defendant sent the face part of G one time at the face of the truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the point of destroying property on which punishment is selected: Article 366 of the Criminal Act that obstructs the performance of official duties: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;