Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

At around 21:10 on June 4, 2016, the Defendant proceeded at a speed of about 60 km from the side of the postal Eup office to the franch Republic.

At the time of night, a driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to live well in the front and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this, and the Defendant received the back portion of the 49cc Oral Ba, which is driven by F that is driven earlier in the same direction as the time is, from the front side of the car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim G (the age of 39) who was accompanied by the above Oralba in the foregoing occupational negligence at the Gelim University G (the age of 39) on June 9, 2016, which was located in 7 in the luxa-ro 7, where the transmission treatment was conducted, due to brain liver, etc. at the Gelim University G (the age of 03:

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] [Article 2 of the Criminal Act] No basic area (8 to 2 years) (the death of a traffic accident) [Article 2 of the Criminal Act] [Pronouncement Decision] [Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, there has occurred a serious result of the death of a victim due to the traffic accident in the instant case. The Defendant was unable to obtain an

However, although the defendant was wrong, he tried to deposit part of the damage compensation for the victim's bereaved family, but he was refused to deposit it at all, and he was subscribed to a comprehensive insurance.