A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2012. 9. 13.경부터 2012. 9. 17.경까지 광주 북구 C 건물 2층에 있는 피고인 운영의 D게임랜드에서, 등급을 받은 내용과는 달리 이용자의 조작이나 능력과는 무관하게 이른바 똑딱이를 사용하여 게임이 자동진행되면서 우연한 방법에 의한 무작위 확률로 게임점수가 획득되는 등으로 개변조된 신대공 게임기 20대를 설치하고, 손님들에게 소정의 점수에 따라 게임기를 통해 배출되는 환금성 높은 금경품을 지급하였다.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classified contents, and operated speculative acts using speculative gaming machines as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the seizure protocol and the results of enforcement support council;

1. Article 45 subparagraph 4 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 (the provision of game products different from those of the game products rated) of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. The reasons for sentencing are as follows: (a) the defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the number and operating period of the game machine used to commit the instant crime; and (c) the money exchange is not included in the instant crime; and (d) the defendant has no same criminal record.