1. The Defendant: (a) each of the KRW 8.5 million against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party A) and the appointed parties C, and against this, from February 28, 2015 to May 31, 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As a result of the health examination conducted on October 29, 2012, the deceased D (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was suspected of pulmonary tuberculosis as a result of the examination conducted on October 29, 2012, and was provided with an observation and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis at the F Hospital run by the Defendant, a medical specialist of chest X, for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis, such as pulmonary tuberculosis and waste convergence, etc. from December 18, 2012 to August 20, 2014.

After all, on August 26, 2014, the Deceased died on February 28, 2015, when being hospitalized at the Hospital of Lifelong University as a non-cell cancer and received treatment for anti-pact cancer and radiation therapy from the Hospital of Property of Lifelong University, the Deceased died of pulmonary waste on February 28, 2015.

B. The specific progress of the diagnosis and treatment of the deceased conducted at the F Hospital is as follows:

(1) On December 18, 2012, the Deceased was admitted to a F Hospital operated by the Defendant, and was voiced in the guest conference, but as a result of the chest radiation photographing examination, the Defendant prescribed a tuberculosis against the Deceased on December 24, 2012, as it verified that the euthanasia was cut off on euthanasia.

(2) On March 25, 2012 and July 22, 2013, the Defendant conducted a chest radiation photographing test with respect to the Deceased, and suspended the prescription of anti- tuberculosis on July 22, 2013.

According to the medical records, the defendant's opinion about each chest radiation photographing test is written as a "mmmon prov" cleaning between drugs.

(3) Since August 21, 2013 and November 14, 2013, the Defendant conducted a chest radiation photographing test for each deceased on June 13, 2014; June 20, 2014; June 20, 2014; June 27, 2014; June 22, 2014; and August 20, 2014.

(2) The defendant's opinion on the result of the examination of chest radiation in the above medical records is as follows. The defendant's opinion on the result of the examination of chest radiation in each of the above chest radiation in the medical records is as follows: 'Fibsis', ' good condition', 'reliation', 'reliation', 'rightly improved', 'reliation', 'reliation', 'reliation', 'reliation', 'reliation', 'reliation', and 'reliation'.