logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.19 2014고단1524
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 7, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 5 million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 4, 2008, a fine of 2.5 million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 4, 2008, and a fine of 2.5 million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on January 28, 2013, and a person who has been sentenced to a summary order of 5 million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on January 28, 2013.

On February 25, 2014, at around 19:25, the Defendant driven a 10km car at approximately 10km to the front road of Daegu-gu apartment complex C in front of the restaurant where the trade name located in the Kandong of Daegu-gu is unknown while under the influence of alcohol content 0.131%.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the same time and place as the above Paragraph (1) and operated a D low-speed car without obtaining a driver’s license.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with D low-priced motor vehicles.

The Defendant operated the said car at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, and continued to drive the fire road next to the Daegu East-gu Fluxathan Fluxa in Fluxa, Daegu-gu, to the agricultural cooperative in the same village from the direction of the Uluxa.

In this case, a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly drive the motor vehicle on the front side and the left side side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop on the road adjacent to the Defendant’s vehicle, and received a part on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle’s vehicle driving by the victim E, which was driven by the victim E.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant damaged the back of the damaged passenger vehicle due to the above occupational negligence to take about KRW 700,928 of the repair cost, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow