logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.24 2018고단1820
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 2018, the Defendant conspiredd to take charge of the following roles: (a) the Defendant: (b) in mind, with each other’s name and the ice ice-based fraud organization’s total responsibilities and its assistants, to obtain money from the victims; (c) the role of exercising overall control over the organization; (d) the role of soliciting the head of a passbook or the e-mail card; and (e) the personal e-mail soliciting books was to transfer the money to the victims or to deliver the money to the victims by making false statements; and (e) the Defendant and the e-mail-related books were to withdraw the money from the money by receiving the collected passbook or the e-mail card; and (e) the delivery books of the money in name are to deliver the money to other trillion staff; and (e) the remittance books of the money in name are to transfer the money to the account in which the organization manages the amount of damage.

1. In addition, on March 31, 2018, the incentive policies belonging to the fraud organization other than the above conditions in the name of fraud were posted on the other Internet site (D) only as if they were under actual conditions on March 31, 2018, and the victim E sent 100,000 won to the victim who made the contact with the Kakakao Stockholm, stating that “The victim would send 100,000 won of the pre-paid deposit to the other female under the pre-paid deposit account of F at around 04:23 on the same day.” In addition, the victim received 10,000 won from the victim to April 1, 205 of the same day as in the pre-paid list of crimes No. 1,500,000 won, and the defendant, around that time, withdrawn the damage in cash and delivered the money to the organization affiliated with the organization.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above members of the above organization in the name of the defendant, was accused of money by deceiving the victim.

2. Any person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall aim at or commit a crime;

arrow