The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment, four years of suspended execution, etc.) is too unfluent and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, where the Defendant committed the instant crime while being tried due to the Defendant’s act of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. in the first head of the crime in the judgment below, and the Defendant committed the instant crime while being tried due to the following: (a) the Defendant committed sexual intercourse with the victim under the influence of alcohol; (b) the nature and method of the relevant crime was very poor; (c) the victim appears to have caused severe physical and mental shock and sexual humiliation; and (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime under the process of being tried due to the instant crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences,

Meanwhile, the following facts are favorable to the defendant: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case as one of his mistake, (b) the defendant agreed with the victim, and the victim wanted to take the defendant's wife; (c) the defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (d) the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) with the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act is in a concurrent relationship with the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and thus, the equity between the case and

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 2년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준 적용 여부: 판결이 확정된 폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률위반( 공동 공갈) 죄 등과 형법 제 37조 후 단의 경합범 관계에 있으므로 양형기준이 적용되지 아니함. 및 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조)...