A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving a CA car.

1. On July 20, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from hazardous driving) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.210% in blood around 23:40 on July 20, 2018, and driving the said vehicle at a 0.210% level, and driving the two-lane road in front of the D cafeteria located in Gangseo-si C at the central high school level with the 6-lane air defense room in front of the D cafeteria.

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by operating the motor vehicle safely by taking into account the front side and the left side of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant, as seen above, driven a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, shocked the part of the back part of the E golf vehicle parked on the right side of the front side of the motor vehicle of the defendant, which was parked on the front side by negligence not operated in the process of manufacturing the steering direction and operation system. The defendant shocked the F, G, and H A-W-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-pur-p

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim I (29 years old) who was a passenger of the Defendant’s car by occupational negligence as above, such as two strings requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant 1 violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) had at the above time, at the above location, KRW 35,978,140 of the cost of repair for the golf car owned by the victim J by negligence in the course of performing his duties as seen above, Defendant 2 did not immediately stop one of the repair cost and take necessary measures so that the sum of KRW 1,916,000 of the repair cost for the Fdelel owned by the victim K to the sum of KRW 1,679,000 of the repair cost for the G MW 110 MW Ha owned by the victim K to the sum of KRW 2,679,000 of the repair cost.

3. The defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drawing driving), shall do so at the time of the above-day Yol-si.