1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On February 12, 2013, the Plaintiff became a member of the Central Transport Company and was working as a taxi driver. On March 14, 2014, around 00:30 on the 14, 2014, the Plaintiff was driving a B taxi while driving a two-lane of the 3rd line of the 15-lane apartment in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, while driving a two-lane of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 15-lane apartment in front of Changwon-si, the Plaintiff stopped the taxi as soon as possible by changing the 1 lane from the 3rd way on the front side to the 2nd one way in order to avoid a collision with the vehicles with the U-

(이하 ‘이 사건 사고‘라 한다). 원고는 이 사건 사고 당시 택시가 급정차하는 과정에서 만취한 승객이 앞으로 튕겨져 나가지 않도록 하기 위하여 우측 팔로 승객의 몸을 젖히다가 우측 어깨와 목의 부상을 입었고 이후 2014. 4. 9. C병원에서 정밀검사를 거쳐 ‘우측 견관절 극상건 파열, 우측 견관절 이두박건 장두 파열, 우측 견관절 염좌, 경추부 염좌’의 진단을 받았다고 주장하면서 2014. 4. 15. 피고에게 요양급여 신청을 하였다.

Around May 21, 2014, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits with respect to “surked salt, surine salt,” and rendered a disposition of non-approval of the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits on the ground that there is no proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s work and the Plaintiff’s work, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits was surined with respect to “surined salt, surined salt,” and that there is no extreme causal link between the Plaintiff’s work and the Defendant

(B) The Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits against the injury or disease of this case was not approved (hereinafter “instant disposition”). / [Grounds for recognition] Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

가. 원고의 주장 원고가 이 사건 사고 당시 만취한 승객이 앞으로 튕겨져 나가지 않도록 하기 위하여 우측 팔로 승객의 몸을 젖히다가 이 사건 상병을 입게 되었으므로, 이 사건 상병은...