logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.07.15 2011고단2130
정치자금법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, and Q are punished by a fine of KRW 300,00 each.

2. The above defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No teacher of a national or public school who is a State public official shall support (political activities) any specific political party or political organization for any political purpose, whatever the pretext it is, with money or materials.

In addition, anyone is prohibited from contributing any political fund in a way that is not provided for in the Political Funds Act, and anyone who intends to contribute any support fund to any political party before March 13, 2006 shall contribute any support fund to the supporters' association of any political party and shall not directly contribute any support fund to any political party. From March 13, 2006, anyone shall not contribute any support fund to any political party including the form in which the supporters' association is closed from March 13, 2006.

1. [Attachment 2011 Highest 2130] Defendant A is a person who is currently serving as a teacher of the S Elementary School after being appointed as a teacher of the national or public school on April 15, 1988.

On or before October 21, 2003, the Defendant filed an application for the “voluntary payment of membership fees” with Tparty (“CS transfer method”) with the T Party, and on or around July 26, 2006, via the CS transfer method to the Korea Financial Settlement Board located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Financial Settlement Board”), and the Defendant’s agricultural bank account with KRW 10,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account via the TP transfer method (hereinafter “T Party Account”) with the TP account opened in the National Bank Credit Business Center located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Financial Settlement Board”). However, it is difficult to conclude that the materials submitted by the Defendants were intended to pay the “party membership fees” directly to a political party in the status of party members under the law when they pay the funds. According to the duly adopted and evidence duly examined, if the Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion and the contents of the indictment are modified from the “party membership fees” without changing the contents of the indictment and the contents of the indictment.

arrow