logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.24 2017구합72256
부당이득금징수처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details and details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a medical corporation that establishes and operates the C convalescent Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

B. From February 9, 2015 to February 13, 2015, the Minister of Health and Welfare conducted an on-site investigation of the instant hospital’s matters concerning medical care benefits and medical benefits (hereinafter “instant on-site investigation”) (from February 9, 2015 to February 13, 2015).

C. On May 2, 2017, the Minister of Health and Welfare issued a disposition suspending the business of 89 days for medical care institutions based on Article 98(1)1 of the former National Health Insurance Act (amended by Act No. 13985, Feb. 3, 2016; hereinafter the same) on the ground that “the Plaintiff was unfairly paid medical care benefit costs of KRW 180,441,170 in total from the Defendant by the following means:

(2) On the other hand, the Plaintiff: (a) the Plaintiff reported as a nursing staff member exclusively in charge of providing nursing services to in-patients even though it did not exclusively take charge of providing nursing services for in-patients as indicated in the same table (hereinafter “the instant table period”); (b) the grade of hospitalization fee system (hereinafter “in-house grade”) according to the level of securing nursing workforce in February 2, 2014 of the instant hospital from 8 to 1; (c) the class of nursing in March 3, 2014 from 7 to 1; and (d) the class of nursing in April 4, 2014 from 6 to 11 in the quarter from 3/4th quarter from 2014; and (b) the rate of the number of nurses in-house patients of the instant hospital from 3/4/4:1, 2014 to 25/4:111, respectively; and (d) the Defendant may not be paid from 2/14th quarter from 2014 to 2/14.

arrow