logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.14 2016고합493
특수공무집행방해치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of three years and a short term of two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant, without wearing a safety cap on the front side of the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, and without wearing a safety cap on May 18, 2016, was driving a mobile phone on the side of the test site for driver’s license and driving it on the two-lane from the four-lane side of the test site for driver’s license. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) entered the three-lane from the three-lane to the two-lane to prevent the Defendant from wearing a safety cap in order to prevent the Defendant’s vehicle from wearing a safety cap; and (b) was trying to look at the police officer by blocking the police officer.

Defendant 1 tried to flee at a two-lane from the two-lane to the one-lane, and attempted to flee, but tried to stop the Defendant’s escape through the two-lanes in order to stop the Defendant’s escape, the Defendant 1 got G in front of the Oba, which is a dangerous object, while proceeding to the 2-lanes, at a two-lane.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on traffic control, which is a dangerous object, and thereby, the Defendant suffered approximately 16 weeks old and long-term open-up frameworks and two frameworks on the left side, which require approximately 16 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to H, I, F, and G;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 144 (2) (main sentence), Article 144 (1), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 2 and 60(2) of the Juvenile Act, Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the defendant is deemed to be a juvenile in light of his/her characteristics) of the Juvenile Act, and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Articles 2 and 60(1) of the Illegal Juvenile Act is that the defendant received a police officer, who is a dangerous object, performing official duties, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties, and the police officer suffered approximately 16 weeks of medical care.

arrow