A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 29, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment by the Seoul Western District Court due to property damage, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence by the Seocheon Prison on December 17, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 6, 2017, around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) fluencing the victim D’s “E” operated by Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) fluencingly, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (c) fluencing the victim with a large interest that “the victim would be able to take advantage of glusium, glusium, and glusium; (d) flusium; (e) flusium and glusium; and (e) flusium and glusium; and (e) flusium and glusium; and (e) flusium and glusium; and (e) flusium and glu

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place described in the preceding paragraph, while obstructing the Center’s work at a place, such as the time and place described in the preceding paragraph, was found to be defective in G by the Chief G of the F District of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report, to make the Defendant correct, and the said G “Y, , , fl

“Along with the desire of “A”, the chest of G was tightly pushed down one time in his hand, satisfing it by cutting down without any fright shoulder of G, sat off it, off the sat, and towards the face of G.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. A H statement;

1. Recording notes;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from victims D);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (related to recidivism during the period of repeated crime and the same criminal records);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;