logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.09.03 2020고정612
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-si.

On March 12, 2020, the Defendant driven the above taxi on March 00:40, and driven the front road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at a speed of about 30km per hour, depending on the two-lanes between the 3-lanes of city and the 30km of city, from Seoul D elementary Ep. to the ep.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed in the front side, it was necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a vehicle driving the intersection by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to view it as a stop signal, and neglected to see it as it was, and neglected to see it as it was, the G taxi driver's part of the victim F (55 years old) driving that was directly engaged in according to green signal, from the face of the old wave shooting range to the face of the defendant's driver's taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim, such as dental scare and sugar, which requires treatment for about four weeks, and the victim H (51 years of age) who is the passenger of the taxi driving the victim, for about two weeks of medical treatment, such injury as knee and knee, and the unknown salt ties and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the examination report on the actual condition of the defendant's statement in the court (45 pages, 47 pages of the investigation record);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow