The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, and one hundred thousand won of collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is divided into and reflected against the mistake, and the crime of this case is limited to one-time act of trading, arranging the trade of and medication for each penphone, and the amount of penphones offered for the crime is not much much, and the defendant actively cooperates with the investigation of the investigation agency to arrest the narcotics offender up to the trial.

However, the defendant not only has the history of having been punished for the same crime but also committed each of the crimes of this case in approximately two months since he was released from prison, even though he was a repeated crime, and the crime of this case was committed not only simply on the medication or purchase of scopon, but also on the intermediation act, which is highly likely to be subject to criticism. The court below held that such defendant needs to be isolated from the harmful environment. Considering all the above circumstances, the court below seems to have determined the punishment in full view of all the sentencing conditions as stated in the records and arguments of this case, it does not seem that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.