logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누55553
업무정지등처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The Defendant limited to the Plaintiff on December 18, 2015.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is based on Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the execution of the disposition of this case is suspended ex officio by applying Article 23 (2) and (3) of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow