logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.02.09 2016고단444
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant C’s fine of 1,00,000 won, and Defendant D’s fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s fraud: (a) was a person who actually owns G heading (1.2 metric tons, fuel for use: 1.50 Madin and engine Madin) registered in the Defendant’s name under the Defendant’s Defendant’s own F; (b) was in a fisheries cooperative located in Northwest-gun, North Korea before January 14, 2015; (c) did not have depart from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of operation using the above management vessel; (d) the Defendant submitted a falsified oil supply card and a false entry and departure report, fishery products transaction certificate, and fishery products transaction certificate to the damaged Party entrusted with the duty of supplying free oil from the Republic of Korea; and (e) was issued with the order to release free oil from the Republic of Korea from the said employee; and (e) was supplied with the tin to the 130,600 won-free oil station in J’s territory and submitted it to the 100,000 won-free petroleum gas (hereinafter referred to as “156 56,55”).

In addition, from around that time to December 24, 2015, the Defendant received a total of 64,862,200 won of the market price from the injured party, as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes, 45,800 liters for fishing business (in total of 27,885,490 won) over a total of 200 times.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Defendants A and B are co-offenders with the same vice-Gun fishermen who were employed in the same industry.

The Defendants, even though Defendant B did not have depart from the Republic of Korea for the purpose of fishing with L (1.5 tons, 150 E) of the aquaculture management line owned by Defendant B, did not intend to obtain and sell the fishery products in the aquaculture, the Defendants, despite the fact that there was no fact that he collected and sold the fishery products in the aquaculture, were falsely prepared the relevant documents and submitted them to the I TK to obtain tax exemption gasoline from the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, Defendant B had the duty-free oil supply card and falsity to Defendant A in the residence of Defendant A located in the North Korean Navy M in the middle of July 2015.

arrow