logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.11.10 2020고단2113
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to produce or distribute a game product for the purpose of distributing the game product or providing for the use thereof shall obtain a rating on the contents of the game product concerned from the Game Management Committee before producing or distributing the game product concerned, and no person shall provide the game product with contents different from those of the rating.

Nevertheless, from March 20, 2020 to April 22, 2020, the Defendant offered “E” to many unspecified customers visiting the 'DPC’ operated by the Defendant, and provided game products by means of filling an Arabic game money, which was created voluntarily through the manager’s page, rather than an indirect shock method to acquire game money through the purchase of glaps and glaps, which was classified by the method of self-certification, after being given the rating.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents other than the method of classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F prepared statement of suspect interrogation of the police with respect to F;

1. Seizure records;

1. A report on internal investigation (number 12 to 14);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. In full view of the fact that an illegal game room business size, duration, criminal records, confession, and attitude against the order of provisional payment as stated in the facts charged for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentence identical to the order was determined.

arrow