Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2015, the Defendant, together with C, D, and E on February 20, 2015, had a dispute with the victim H(30 years of age)’s behavior and vision attached to the “Gurher” located in Namyang-si F, Nam-si. On February 20, 2015, the Defendant left the victim’s the victim’s wurd with the victim’s wurk with his/her finger, and went over once the victim’s wurd with his/her wurk with his/her wur on his/her hand, and caused the victim to undergo approximately three-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness C;

1. Statement made by the witness H in the third public trial records;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the images of a fluor photograph;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion is consistent with the victim’s breathing candles, but there is no fact that the victim’s spaths were pushed down with the victim’s spaths and spawned one time by drinking the victim’s spaths as indicated in the facts charged.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the victim set the victim’s arms and fats in this court, and the Defendant laid down the victim’s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ss

The statement is made by C, and C, in this court, that the defendant had been seen to live in a breath of the victim, but it was not deemed to have been drinking.

However, the statement is made (only about 10 centm of the defendant and the victim, and there is a possibility that the defendant could not see that he was at the time of drinking as the head of C in the middle of the defendant and the victim, and that he did not see that he was at the time of drinking as his head). The defendant, C, and the victim was only the defendant, C, and the victim was at the time, and the content of the medical certificate of injury issued following the day of this case and the victim.