logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.12 2018고정1261
주거침입등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was aware that B, who was the wife, established a non-wheeled relationship with the victim C, was late.

이에 피고인은 2018. 5. 6. 11:40 경 서울 노원구 D, 406호에 있는 피해자의 집에 아내와 함 게 찾아가 아 내로 하여금 피해자의 주거지 현관문 비밀번호를 눌러 문을 열고 그 집 안방까지 들어가 피해자의 주거지 내에 있는 책장, 서랍, 옷장, 화장실 등을 뒤져, 피해자와 자신의 처가 주고받은 편지 및 사진을 찾은 뒤 격분하여 화장실 수납장 및 수납장 유리 선반을 손바닥으로 쳐 파손하고, 옷장에 있던 패딩을 꺼 내 침대에 올려놓고, 그 패딩과 침대 매트리스에 담배불을 비벼 껐다.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to the victim's photograph) and the accompanying photograph;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property) and selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. 50,000 won of a fine under the suspended sentence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day) to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the fact that the defendant recognized all the criminal facts of this case and reflects the criminal facts of this case, and the motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, etc.);

arrow