logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단792
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 15,00,000 won.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of corporation B in substantial Gu D and 1st floor from July 31, 2012, and the defendant corporation B is a corporation established for the purpose of household manufacturing and sales business.

1. Defendant A’s country (the Ministry of Employment and Labor is the Ministry of Chungcheongbuk-do and Cheongju-si) and local governments (the Ministry of Chungcheongbuk-do and Cheongju-si) shall select a prospective social enterprise whose employment ratio of vulnerable groups is not less than 50% in order to provide the jobs of vulnerable groups such as the aged and low-income earners with common financial resources from 2010, and for the selected preliminary social enterprise, the “preliminary social enterprise job creation business” was conducted to support part of the personnel expenses and social insurance premiums for all participating workers per worker for a maximum of two years.

After establishing the Defendant Company B on July 31, 2012, on August 30, 2012, the Defendant applied for the designation of a prospective social enterprise in Chungcheongbuk-do, and applied for subsidies for the said project at the same time. On September 28, 2012, when Company B was designated as a prospective social enterprise in Chungcheongbuk-do and was designated as a recipient of subsidies, the Defendant abused the fact that the management supervision of the local government having jurisdiction over the conclusion of labor contracts was weak, and instead, instead of having employed workers of the disadvantaged class as full-time workers, instead of having employed workers of the disadvantaged class as full-time workers at least 50 percent of the total number of workers, he/she was willing to receive subsidies by falsely preparing relevant documents.

In December 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) performed the creation of jobs for the viewing of the audience in a considerable amount of 155 Cheongju City on December 3, 2012; (b) did not employ workers E, F, and G from the vulnerable class to the employee of the company B on December 2, 2012; (c) instead of having employed workers H and I, the Defendant fabricated documents, such as the attendance card, wage ledger, and wage remittance data, as if he employed workers from the vulnerable class at least 50%, and then, (d) operated the documents, such as the attendance card, the wage ledger,

arrow