logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.11.12 2015고단1011
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant was driving a C low-speed car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.155% from around 5 kilometers to 38 national highways located in the 38th national highways located in the new malgorith (in the vicinity of the entrance of the seeds and seedlings) at the time of scopic rout from the 38th national highways located in the new malgorith (hereinafter referred to as “copic mal”).

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a C low-speed car.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.15% as stated in the preceding paragraph, operated the national highway No. 38 in the vicinity of the entrance of tombstones located at the entrance of the scopon from the entrance to the scopon.

At night, there was a construction section where two signal numbers are posted at the point of each end of the construction section so that vehicles can pass through only through one lane in the relationship where the construction is in progress, and where the vehicle is controlled by using signal sealing and electric shocks. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as: (a) the driver of the vehicle is well aware of the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle; (b) the operation of the steering vehicle is accurately operated; and (c) the operation of the steering vehicle is safe in accordance with signalling.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant did not discover the signal number of the front section of the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and proceeded against the signal number received, the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the victim D(36 years old) who discovered and stopped the Defendant’s vehicle in the direction opposite to the signal number, and the vehicle was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the passenger vehicle, and due to the shock, the vehicle was driven by the Defendant.

arrow