A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[former Fact-finding] B was a person who was in office as the head of the C Union (hereinafter “C Union”) from May 7, 2009 to March 20, 2015. Around August 13, 2013, at the request of the Defendant, who was known to ordinary level of peace, offered a loan of KRW 15 million to D, and the constructor introduced E as a construction business operator and allowed E to lend KRW 15 million to D, and thereafter, B received KRW 10 million from the E business operator on September 30, 2013 through the F account, which is an employee of the C Association.

B Around November 24, 2015, upon receipt of the above KRW 10 million from C Association and under investigation by the police, etc., B made a false statement as if he/she lent money to D by E to E on August 13, 2013, and made a false statement as if he/she had the Defendant lent the money to D to E, thereby creating a relationship with the Defendant’s false claim as if he/she was his/her debtor. On September 30, 2013, B made a false statement as if he/she had the Defendant repaid the Defendant’s debt at the request of E, E, G, and F made a false statement in response thereto, and received disposition from the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office on November 28, 2016.

After investigation into B and E on February 6, 2018 was initiated on the charge of bribery, etc., the defendant, B and B were confirmed to have been false, and on August 16, 2018, B were sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months due to the charge of bribery, including the above KRW 10 million.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 14:00 on July 4, 2018, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) against the above court No. 2018Gohap27, in the court of law No. 301, the Daejeon District Court's Yannam-gu, Daejeon District Court's Branch Office No. 301, the Defendant asked the prosecutor's question that "When he went to the office of the said court, B will first come to the Defendant prior to the misunderstanding of DC prior to the misunderstanding of DC, I am."