logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.11 2015가합510066
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is on the notarial deed of Promissory Notes No. 33, 2014.

Reasons

1. Grounds for recognition;

A. On February 20, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a performance-based contract on the apartment-building molding construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) among the apartment-building construction works (construction works (construction sections 2) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si. The contract amount of the said construction works shall be KRW 1,150,343,50, and the monthly performance-based bonus of KRW 3,000 shall be paid under certain conditions; the construction period shall be from December 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014; and “the contract amount x 115,035,000 (contract amount x 10%) shall be deposited with the Defendant until the completion of the molding construction work; and the head office shall be substituted by a notarized document.”

B. Around that time, on February 21, 2014, a promissory note, the issue date of which is KRW 115,035,00,00 (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) was issued to the Defendant under the Plaintiff’s name, and the date of payment was September 30, 2014. The Plaintiff’s agent, when delay in the payment of the said promissory note, a notary public, who, at the time of delay, prepares a notarized deed of promissory note No. 33, 2014 (hereinafter “instant authentic deed”).

C. On October 6, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed that on October 6, 2014, “the Plaintiff,” as of October 6, 2014, with respect to B apartment construction works, 1 district reinforced concrete construction works, 2 district mold construction works (AL pumps, 5 Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong 10) as of October 6, 201, all of the amounts of the Plaintiff’s team’s construction work as of December 6, 2014 were finally settled at KRW 70,00,000 as confirmed between both parties. The Plaintiff’s representative of the Plaintiff’s employees recognized the contents of this undertaking and confirmed that there was no claim for any more than the amount on the Han Heavy Industries and the Defendant’s side for any reason, and, at the time of the occurrence of the problem, promise to

The above defendant shall recognize all of the above commitments and represent workers.

arrow