logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고정835
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2014, at around 15:30, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D” located in the Northern-gu, Gwangju-si; (b) the Defendant did not repay the prices of goods traded on credit by the Defendant; (c) 4 times the side and the parts of the parts of the back and the uniforms of the victim E (the age of 52) on the ground that the Defendant did not repay the prices of goods traded on credit; and (d) stated that “this chrop and the parts of the parts of the back and the clothes are 4 times the Defendant would be able to bring the victim’s breath, the frop, the flap, the flag, the flag,” and carried the victim’s fla

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as an open room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. The E’s statement [the above statement is written by a judicial police officer under Article 312(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act who is not the defendant and prepared by a person who is not the defendant and is not the defendant under Article 313(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and all these statements are admissible as evidence unless the defendant consents to the use of them as evidence. However, according to the results of the correction of address on September 5, 2014 and the witness materials investigation report on October 29, 2014, E is not present at the investigation records and residents’ meeting (public address), and neighboring residents are not aware of E at all, and there is no contact with the current phone number on the ground that there is no entry of E in the current name, and it is difficult to know where the person making the original statement is unable to make a statement as a witness at court. Furthermore, the above protocol and its contents are considerably detailed, and it is admissible under Article 14 of the Criminal Procedure Act as well as where it is proved that there is no other reason to harm the defendant’s interests in the record].

arrow