The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument that the judgment of the court below erred in the number of offenses is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is asserted by the defendant only when it comes to the final appeal that there was no ground for appeal or that there was no ground for ex officio judgment.

In addition, according to the records, the defendant appealed from the judgment of the court of first instance, and asserted a mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act among the facts charged in this case, along with the grounds for appeal, and withdrawn the grounds for appeal as to mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles on the first trial date of the court below.

In such a case, the argument that the lower court erred by mistake of facts or by misapprehending legal principles as to the violation of the Road Traffic Act among the facts charged in the instant case does not constitute a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.