The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Defendant A was aware of the victim C and from 2004 at the beginning of Gangwon-do.

Defendant

A on April 2014, at E-cafeteria located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. D, a witness F was not allowed to call “C’s bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch

From June 2013 to April 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by delivering the phrase “C’s money at the beginning of her territory,” i.e., from June 2013 to April 2014 to F, G, H, I, and J.

Judgment

The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 312(2) of the same Act provides that a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim’s explicit intent. The victim expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant on April 23, 2015, and thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.