logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.01.08 2019가단103528
임금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Plaintiff A is the trade name of “E”, Plaintiff B is the trade name of “F”, Plaintiff C is the individual entrepreneur who conducts electrical construction business and automatic control business with the trade name of “G”. 2) The Defendant is a person who actually operates electrical construction business and automatic fishery business with the trade name of “HI”.

B. The J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) entered into a successive contract for construction works ordered L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”) to provide a three-regular production and installation work at K site, and L subcontracted three-regular production and installation work to M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”) and M in sequence to N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”).

C. The Plaintiffs were placed in J or L’s workplace and ordered by J to make three regular productions and installations ordered by J, M, and N in sequence.

[Judgment of the court below] The ground for recognition is without merit, Gap evidence No. 1, and the ground for appeal

2. Determination on claims for payment of contractual price

A. On June 27, 2017, Plaintiff A and B entered into a contract with the Defendant to manufacture and install three regular one unit between Plaintiff A and B, and to pay wages by setting a daily amount of 250,000 won per day of the number of workers invested by the Defendant.

Plaintiff

C On July 6, 2017, between the Defendant and the Defendant, the Plaintiff C entered into a contract with the Defendant to make and install the three regular one, and set a daily wage of 220,000 won per day for the number of employees invested from the Defendant.

B. (112,875,00 won is paid for each of the three-yearly productions from June 29, 2017 to July 31, 2017, and from August 4, 2017 to August 29, 2017. Of them, Plaintiff A received only KRW 47,500,000, and did not receive the remainder of KRW 65,375,000.

B From June 28, 2017 to July 22, 2017, from August 7, 2017 to August 30, 2017, and from July 31, 2017 to August 31, 2017, Plaintiff B’s two-lanes.

arrow