1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

On March 9, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on March 9, 2007, and on October 28, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime in the same court on June, 2009, and was in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on not less than two occasions.

On January 11, 2016, at around 07:25, the Defendant driven a c-burled car with alcohol content of about 4km from around 0.194% under the influence of alcohol from around the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the alley-dong, whether in the mouth in the Seo-gu Agriculturaldong, or from around 0.194% of alcohol content.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on the actual condition, a report on the detection of a driver engaged in the primary business and a report on the circumstances of the driver engaged in primary business;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (a copy of the judgment attached);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that there exists a history of punishment several times including suspended sentence due to the suspension of drinking for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and the fact that there is no record of punishment since 2009, and the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered, taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc.