The punishment of defendants shall be one year and three months.

The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2020, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving a B-learning car on February 13, 2020, was driving at the speed of 297, which is the three-dimensional order of the former North Korean Dos, and the front of the three-dimensional intersection from the front line to the three-lane order of the three-lane order of the front line.

The Defendant set the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear and the steering gear on the part of the Defendant’s front and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear in the direction of DNA car driven by C(65 years old) at the one-lane side of the Defendant’s moving-way.

C has suffered the symptoms, such as salt pans, in need of treatment for about two weeks.

The defendant caused the injury of the victim C due to the occupational negligence accident.

2. On February 24, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Jeonju District Court to a fine of KRW 1 million due to the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant was required to take a alcohol test by inserting three minutes of drinking alcohol measuring instruments for about 15 minutes on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, deep distance, and maintaining a little red view, from F of the police box affiliated with the EM which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant carried out a traffic accident at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

However, the defendant, who has reasonable grounds to recognize that he is under the influence of alcohol, did not comply with the pulmonary examination of a police officer without justifiable grounds.

The Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving or drinking refusal to take a drinking test more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on investigation (Refusal of measuring);

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;