beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 589,525,00 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from November 13, 2015 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 1, 2013, the Defendant, even though he did not know to the Plaintiff along with C on February 1, 2013, by deceiving the Plaintiff as to the 2,500,000 foot molds from February 15, 2013 to February 4, 2014, acquired a total of KRW 35,000,000 on 14 occasions every month from the Plaintiff as a guidance. 2) On April 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the Plaintiff to make an investment of KRW 200,000,000 to the Plaintiff as an investment money, acquired KRW 300,000 from the Plaintiff as a sum of KRW 70,00,000 on April 4, 2013, and acquired KRW 130,00,000 from the Plaintiff as an investment money.
3) On May 24, 2013, the Defendant deceivings the Plaintiff to gather money by making more investments of KRW 350 million in early 2013, and acquired KRW 310,00,000 from the Plaintiff as investment money. (4) On May 24, 2013, the Defendant deceivings the Plaintiff to have money contributed to both KRW 1,00,000 for the purpose of donation by deceiving the Plaintiff to have money contributed to the Plaintiff.
5) Around June 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff would have the Plaintiff enter an alternative school by deceiving the Plaintiff’s children to enter the alternative school; and (b) acquired KRW 100,00,000 from the Plaintiff as a rain fund; (c) on September 9, 2013, the Defendant enticed the Plaintiff that the Defendant would have to disclose the confluent gift to the Plaintiff in order to enter the said alternative school; and (d) by deceiving the Plaintiff on September 1, 2013, the Defendant acquired KRW 1,200,000 from the Plaintiff as a gift fund.
7) On October 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the Plaintiff on October 25, 2013, that the Plaintiff should have caused the loss of business and damage to his family; and (b) acquired KRW 57,770,00 from the Plaintiff as an anti-public policy; and (c) the Defendant, on January 25, 2014, by deceiving the Plaintiff that the Defendant would have up to the son to go to the said alternative school, in order to bring the Plaintiff into the said alternative school, by deceiving the Plaintiff that he would have up to go to the son’s gift, thereby obtaining KRW 1,55,00 from the Plaintiff as a gift fund.
B. The defendant who became final and conclusive of a criminal judgment against the defendant is above A.
. The facts stated in the paragraph.