logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.05.17 2017고단351
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The case: the judgment rendered by Changwon District Court on February 2, 2017: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of two years and six months: Finality of February 16, 2017 / [criminal facts]

1. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant called that “A victim C was phoneed to the former worker who was in an influence place and called the victim to the effect that “it is possible to enter the company called Busan New Port D, and it is necessary to pay street funds to the personnel management officer.”

However, even if the victim received money from the injured party, there is no intention or ability to enter the above company.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 5 million won from the victim, i.e., the defendant's account in the name of the defendant, to the new cooperation account (E).

2. On December 3, 2014, the Defendant called the victim F to the effect that he phoneed the son who was a former workplace at the scene of a fire on December 3, 2014, to the effect that “it is necessary to have the son find employment to the position of the Busan New Harbor site and offer the son funds necessary.”

However, even if the victim received money from the injured party, the injured party did not have the intention or ability to find employment in the above company.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 5 million won to the account (G) of the national bank account in the name of the defendant to the victim.

3. Victims H;

A. On July 2015, the Defendant stated to the effect that, at the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant would offer mineral extraction services by establishing an I company, and that, upon extracting minerals, a dump truck is necessary to transport to spores at the port and port, and that the Defendant would give a mineral transport business right on the face of KRW 10 million.

However, even if the victim received money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to permit the mineral transport business.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is under the name of the defendant around July 27, 2015.

arrow