1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked, and

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the submission or addition as follows. Thus, this case is quoted as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From 9th to 11th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part used or added is as follows: (a) 8th to 9th of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In addition, the defendant asserts that since the defendant paid 5 million won among the taxes imposed on G, one of the registered titleholders with respect to the land of this case, the amount should be deducted from the unjust enrichment to be returned by the defendant.

In light of the evidence mentioned above and the purport of the entire argument in Eul, Eul, or Eul's evidence Nos. 3 and 4, one of the registered titleholders with respect to the land of this case is the plaintiff's clan G on July 29, 2013, the plaintiff's clan G, the plaintiff's share of KRW 11,49,130 on the aggregate of KRW 1,052,570 on July 31, 2013, capital gains tax of KRW 509,850 on July 29, 2013, additional tax of KRW 331,060, increased additional tax of KRW 132,420, increased additional tax of KRW 132,420 on July 31, 2013, the plaintiff's share of KRW 1,084,570 on the share of KRW 50,000 on the share of the plaintiff's land, and the defendant's share of this case's transfer income tax can be found to be paid by the plaintiff's share.

Therefore, the defendant is entitled to 64,00,000 won (=80,000,000 - 16,000,000) remaining after deducting the adequate amount of remuneration from the agreed remuneration amount to the plaintiff.