logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.08.20 2013고단374
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 13, 1998, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution for ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Daejeon District Court's Branch on May 22, 2012, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 30, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant, who is the defendant's wife, did not lend money to the victim D and did not pay the money to the victim, with the doping that C shall pay the money borrowed by the victim, and he did not pay the money.

1. On May 10, 2010, the Defendant called the victim at an infinite location in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do and received the successful bid of 102 and 805 E Apartment-dong 105, which is located in Yanananan-si, and lent money that falls short of the balance.

year;

6.2. There is no money until 6.2. It will be paid up to the money borrowed prior to that time.

“.” The purport of “C” is that “The security deposit for the house in which the money is live is KRW 120 million for the victim in a multilateral bank located in front of the river basin on May 17, 2010.”

It is possible to borrow money immediately to receive the deposit money.

‘Falsely speaking’ was made to the effect that it was “.

However, the fact was that the defendant and C were not a full-time tax but a monthly tax, and the defendant was a bad credit holder at the time and had a debt equivalent to one billion won while running a business, and there was no intention or ability to complete payment even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of a certain amount of income.

The Defendant succeeded to the debt amounting to 200 million won established on the above E apartment, and paid the balance with the borrowed money from the victim to purchase the above E apartment. However, the Defendant failed to succeed to the debt due to bad credit and did not have the ability to pay interest on the said debt, and the sales contract for the said apartment was revoked, and the said apartment was refunded, but all the money was used at will. The Defendant is with C.

arrow