Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On September 2, 1995, around September 14:30, 1995, the Defendant, the owner of a truck A, who is his employee B, violated the restriction on operation by carrying a cargo of 11.5 tons on a 2 axis in excess of 10 tons of a stable weight at the front of the Seoul Tol department, Seoul Metropolitan City Tol, and operating the said vehicle.
2. The judgment prosecutor, applying Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and wholly amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), filed a public prosecution and the punishment of a fine of KRW 700,00 was finalized due to a summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the same Act provides that "if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article," with respect to Article 86 of the same Act that "if the agent, employee, or other employee of the corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article."
Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.