logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.01.29 2018고정877
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 17, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at 0.131% on blood alcohol level on September 30, 2018, the Defendant driven a high-gu 125cc two-wheeled vehicle at the 2km section in front of the high-gu Gam field in which it is impossible to find out whether the Defendant was able to find out whether it was fluorized in the use principle at the Sung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

2. The Defendant violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a two-wheeled automobile with no registered substitute forest 125cc.

No one shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated an automobile without mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the reports on traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, photographs of accident sites and related vehicles, copies of the ledger of drinkging meters, notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, reports on the state of drinking driving, reports on the state of driver's standing and standing statement, the next red inquiry, and the

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2, and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Articles 46 (2) 2, and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the point of operating automobiles which are not mandatory insurance), the selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has recognized and reflected his/her mistake. It seems that the elderly and basic living beneficiaries have not been sufficiently capable of economic situation.

However, drinking driving needs to be strictly punished for crimes that are highly dangerous to harm the life and body of others.

The measured blood alcohol concentration is considerably high by 0.131%, and in this case, the minimum statutory penalty of the fine is set.

arrow